Referendum must pass so Carnegie Library remains

Editorials featured in the Forum section are solely the opinions of their individual authors.

That quiet place you go to read, to study, to think: the library. And for anyone who has had to pull an all-nighter, the library represents a proverbial undergraduate battleground strewn with sleeping students and empty coffee cups.

However, the library a couple blocks down the street has become a different sort of battleground.

On Nov. 8, there will be a referendum on the ballot to create a source of funding for Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh, which is now in jeopardy from funding cuts. The public library system of Pittsburgh consists of 19 neighborhood locations, a community that includes learning programs and job-search assistance, and — from my own experience growing up in Pittsburgh — a place that fosters intellectual curiosity in young learners.

The referendum calls for a 0.25-mill special tax on all taxable real estate in the City of Pittsburgh to be allocated for the library, which amounts to $25 per year or $2.09 per month on $100,000 of assessed value.

To put that in perspective, that’s about the cost of a hardcover book, one-tenth the cost of an organic chemistry book, and about one two-thousandth the cost of a year’s tuition at Carnegie Mellon University. And, honestly, the public library has a much nicer atmosphere than the brutalism of Wean Hall and the dungeon-like Engineering and Science Library.

So go out and vote yes for Our Library, Our Future’s initiative and keep open a vibrant library system for yinz readers aht there.